Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Intern Med ; 182(5): 491-493, 2022 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1798077
2.
Contraception ; 104(3): 289-295, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1216311

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore US provider perspectives about self-sourced medication abortion and how their attitudes and clinic practices changed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a multi-method study of survey and interview data. We performed 40 baseline interviews and surveys in spring 2019 and 36 follow-up surveys and ten interviews one year later. We compared pre- and post-Likert scale responses of provider views on the importance of different aspects of standard medication abortion assessment and evaluation (e.g., related to ultrasounds and blood-typing). We performed content analysis of the follow-up interviews using deductive-inductive analysis. RESULTS: Survey results revealed that clinics substantially changed their medication abortion protocols in response to COVID-19, with more than half increasing their gestational age limits and introducing telemedicine for follow-up of a medication abortion. Interview analysis suggested that physicians were more supportive of self-sourced medication abortion in response to changing clinic protocols that decreased in-clinic assessment and evaluation for medication abortion, and as a result of physicians' altered assessments of risk in the context of COVID-19. Having evidence already in place that supported these practice changes made the implementation of new protocols more efficient, while working in a state with restrictive abortion policies thwarted the flexibility of clinics to adapt to changes in standards of care. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study reveals that the COVID-19 pandemic has altered clinical assessment of risk and has shifted practice towards a less medicalized model. Further work to facilitate person-centered abortion information and care can build on initial modifications in response to the pandemic. IMPLICATIONS: COVID-19 has shifted clinician perception of risk and has catalyzed a change in clinical protocols for medication abortion. However, state laws and policies that regulate medication abortion limit physician ability to respond to changes in risk assessment.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos/uso terapéutico , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Aborto Inducido/tendencias , Actitud del Personal de Salud , COVID-19/prevención & control , Médicos/psicología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Cuidados Posteriores/tendencias , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Política de Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Autoadministración , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
3.
Contraception ; 102(6): 392-395, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-753731

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation and results of a proactive patient outreach project to offer self-administered, depot medroxyprogesterone (DMPA) subcutaneous (SC) to interested patients at a California safety-net clinic following expanded state Medicaid coverage. STUDY DESIGN: We contacted non-pregnant patients at an urban, safety-net hospital-based primary care clinic who had been prescribed DMPA intramuscular (IM) in the past year to gauge interest in self-administered DMPA-SC. Interested patients received a prescription for DMPA-SC and a telehealth appointment with a clinic provider to learn self-injection. We recorded patient interest in DMPA-SC, completed appointments, and completed first injections. We conducted initial outreach in May, 2020 and recorded appointment attendance and completed injections through August, 2020. RESULTS: Of 90 eligible patients (age 17-54), we successfully contacted and discussed DMPA-SC with 70 (78%). Twenty-six (37%) patients expressed interest in DMPA-SC and scheduled telehealth appointments to learn to self-administer the medication. Fifteen (58%) of those interested (21% of the total) successfully self-injected DMPA-SC. Of the 44 (63%) patients not interested in DMPA-SC, the three most common reasons were fear of self-injection (n = 23 [52%]), wanting to stop DMPA (n = 11 [25%]), and satisfaction with DMPA-IM (n = 6 [14%]). CONCLUSION: There is interest in and successful initiation of self-administered DMPA-SC among patients at an urban safety net hospital-based primary care clinic who have used DMPA-IM in the last year. IMPLICATIONS: Our data provide evidence for the interest and successful first injection rate after offering self-administered DMPA-SC to patients on DMPA-IM. Expanding coverage of self-administered DMPA-SC could increase patient-centeredness and accessibility of contraception as well as reduce patient anxiety around COVID-19 transmission without losing contraceptive access.


Asunto(s)
Agentes Anticonceptivos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Anticoncepción Hormonal/métodos , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/administración & dosificación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/prevención & control , California , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Medicaid , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad , Autoadministración , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA